Living not striving…

Random thoughts and daily adventures in my life

Oh, snap! August 29, 2008

Filed under: Random stuff — erikaivory @ 12:20 pm

More from that Tim Kimmel guy on “safe” kids.  He is starting to get under my skinWink

Yes, I’m suggesting that Christian families would fare far better raising their children in environments where they have to take spiritual risks, but I’m not suggesting that parents raise their children recklessly. A reckless Christian family is one where children are raised in the world but are not shown how to appropriate God’s power to live distinctively from the world’s way of thinking. Too many parents assume that it is impossible to effectively raise kids in the midst of a corrupt world system. Obviously, they haven’t given church history even a cursory look. If they had, they’d realize that we didn’t get where we are today by functioning safely behind the lines of the spiritual battle.

Seeing the word risk and assuming it is “reckless” is a convenient cop-out for people living in a safe, fear-based Christian circles. That’s because they know full well that to effectively raise kids on the front lines of the world system would require a much more spiritually savvy parent. You can’t dump your children on the front porch of the religious professionals or educators and think you’ve done your duty. You can’t prop them up with evangelical clubs or youth programs that have them doing a lot of biblical calisthenics and think they are somehow prepared. You might actually have to lead them across the battlefield yourself. It is not an easier form of parenting-just better. In the long run, this way produces spiritually strong and sound children.

Raising children in evangelical hideaways and creating a spiritual Disneyland works directly against the development of an empowered relationship with Christ. If anything, safe Christianity isn’t about a relationship with Jesus Christ; it’s about a relationship with a Western, middle-class caricature of Jesus Christ. It’s an option that the majority of Christian parents around the world (especially the Third World) wouldn’t consider for their children because it isn’t even a remote possibility. Raising safe Christian kids is as much a product of middle to upper-class wealth as it is anything else. Putting it bluntly, the reason parents choose to raise their children in highly protected spiritual enclaves is because they can afford to. History has shown, however, that God the Holy Spirit has always provided better protection for children than their parents’ checkbooks ever could.

These protected environments don’t allow a system of spiritual antibodies to develop within the character of the child. This produces a generation of people who must stay within a spiritually sterilized environment in order to thrive. These are nice systems that produce nice kids who marry nice kids who go to nice churches and hang out with like-minded nice friends. Meanwhile, the lost people in the world around them continue in their doomed condition. In these environments, there is little spiritual adventure. God is nice, Jesus becomes a plush toy that we cuddle, and we become irrelevant.


3 Responses to “Oh, snap!”

  1. crystal Says:

    Just Being Devils Advocate (I get his point, but…)—–So if we can afford to keep our kids safe and instill Godly values, isn’t that preparing them to reach out to the other wealthy people that are in our environment? Why would I willing ly put my kids in in “unsafe” environment- when they will be in a safe environment when they grow up? Shouldn’t they be be taught to live and survive (and you do have to survive in “upper to middle class” society) where they will be living when they grow up? What is the point of having them learn how to act a certain way if it won’t benefit them in the future to help spread the gospel to all people- is he saying that the “middle to upper class” don’t need to be witnessed to- we should only go for the Third World and “risky” people?

  2. Good dialogue. Now I have the benefit of reading the book in its entirety but I think he was more referring to perhaps paying to have our kids in private schools or Christian schools or altogether protecting themfrom the world by having only “Christian” friends, sports teams, schools, extracurricular activities, etc. Not necessarily having them live in poverty. He is definitely not against Christian schools or homeschooling but simply questioning using that choice to try and keep our kids “safe” from the world. He also talked about letting them go on mission trips to places that are not just vacation destinations so they can really see what other people have to live like. Certainly we should be salt and light wherever we are but just examine why we choose the way we shelter our kids. Thanks for reading the post. The book is excellent.

  3. kce Says:

    Have you started a book club yet? You and Crystal need to get on it if you haven’t already.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s